The more wind there is, the lower the score, independently of temperature

4 studies · 3,196 archers measured

ForContextAgainst2010201220142016201820202022202420262021, for, n = 31962025, context2014, for2011, context
Each circle is a study: its position gives the year, its row whether it is for, against or context, its size how many participants it measured. Light circles are studies on other populations or without archers.

The most solid count on real competitions is a single one: across 3,196 Chinese professional archers between 2010 and 2016, with temperature held constant, wind speed lowers the average score per arrow and reduces the share of arrows in the 10. It has to be read knowing that events are postponed when the wind is too strong, so the observed range tops out at 5.38 metres per second and is the range in which archers actually shoot. A single event, the 2013 World Championships, gives a figure: in about 3 to 5 metres per second in the afternoon, men's recurve lost about 5 points over 36 arrows at fifty metres against what the morning scores predicted, though there the wind is estimated and temperature changes with the time of day. More on the size of the loss comes from a flight model checked against target photographs from a World Cup: at about two metres per second the first arrow at seventy metres lands twelve or thirteen centimetres from the centre, and the correction the archers make by eye does not bring it back in. The control for temperature therefore remains an association on one circuit, with wind taken from weather stations rather than from the shooting line, and with a loss that is an average over a round rather than over an end.

Also phrased as: "wind costs you points"; "how much does wind cost in score"; "windy days and low scores"; "wind and competition score"

In practice

Wind is the first thing archers look at when they arrive at a field, and a windy day is taken for granted to cost everyone points, not only those who read it badly.

Evidence

  • 2011
    Context Archers Published later

    In a study of arrow drift the author reports an impression from competition: from 3 m/s, and above all in gusts, top compound archers lose points, while below 1 m/s drift can be ignored except at the longest distances. At the 2008 Australian national championships, for example, with little wind at 90 m the best archers were just short of the world record, and later, with gusts above 3 m/s, they scored well below expectation. The author himself calls it a subjective check, with no count of points.

    Minimizing wind drift of an arrow · J L Park

  • 2014
    For Archers Published later

    The 2013 World Championships in Antalya, men's recurve: 90 m and 70 m were shot in the morning in little wind, 50 m and 30 m in the afternoon in a moderate wind of about 3 to 5 m/s. At 70 m the scores were within half a point of those expected from 90 m, at 50 m they were about four skill-level index points below expectation, and the author puts the difference down to the wind, about 5 points over the 36 arrows at 50 m. It is a single event, the wind is estimated rather than measured at the shooting line, and morning and afternoon also separate the temperature, which is not controlled here.

    Modelling archers’ scores at different distances to quantify score loss due to equipment selection and technique errors · James L Park

  • 2021
    For Archers Published later

    3,196 Chinese professional archers, competitions from 2010 to 2016, with fixed effects and temperature in the model: the main effect of wind speed on the average score runs from -0.0736 (p < 0.10) to -0.184 (p < 0.05) depending on the specification, and on the share of arrows in the 10 it is -0.0224 (p < 0.05) and -0.0443 (p < 0.01). The sample holds no extreme wind, because events are postponed: the observed maximum is 5.38 m/s. The figures come from the working paper deposited on SSRN: the published version is not open access and may differ.

    Adaptation and the distributional effects of heat: Evidence from professional archery competitions · Yun Qiu, Jinhua Zhao

  • 2025
    Context Model Published later

    An arrow flight model compared with target photographs from a World Cup stage in Shanghai: with crosswind and headwind of about 2 m/s the first arrows at 70 m land 0.12 and 0.125 m from the centre, and after the athletes' own correction deviations of 0.08 and 0.13 m remain, while the model says 0.06 m would be attainable. No archer was measured in a trial.

    Influences of an Arrow’s Aerodynamic Pressure Center on Recurve Bow Shooting · Wenfeng Shen, Liang Hu, Jing Hu, Yiming Xu, Xixia Xu, Jieqing Zheng

Status history

  1. 2011 Not studied A study of arrow drift contains the first observation from competition: from 3 metres per second top compound archers lose points, and at the 2008 Australian championships the best archers, close to the record in little wind, scored well below that once gusts passed the threshold. The author himself calls it a subjective check, with no count of points, so the loss on the scorecard is still to be measured.
  2. 2014 Reported The first count in points comes from a single event, the 2013 World Championships: men's recurve shot 90 m and 70 m in the morning in little wind and 50 m and 30 m in the afternoon in about 3 to 5 metres per second, and at 50 m lost about 5 points over 36 arrows against what the morning scores predicted. It points the way of the claim, but it is one event, the wind is estimated and temperature is not separated, since it too changes between morning and afternoon: reported.
  3. 2021 Reported The first count across many competitions with temperature in the model, published online in 2021 and then in the 2022 issue: across 3,196 Chinese professional archers, wind speed lowers the average score per arrow and reduces the share of arrows in the 10, with temperature held constant. It has to be read knowing that events are postponed when the wind is too strong, so the observed range is the range in which archers actually shoot. With the 2013 event there are two studies in favour, but only this one separates wind from temperature, as the claim requires: reported.
  4. 2025 Reported A flight model checked against target photographs from a World Cup gives the order of magnitude of the loss: at about two metres per second the first arrow at seventy metres lands twelve or thirteen centimetres from the centre, and the correction the athletes make by eye does not bring it back in. It is a model, not a measurement on archers, so it stands as context and the status stays reported.

Related

Related articles

Related studies

Research lines

Studies describe groups of archers, and your own numbers show how far the finding applies to your shooting.

See the full assessment
Cite
APA

Campagna, M. (2026). The more wind there is, the lower the score, independently of temperature (Version 2). In Evidence Registry. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/wind-lowers-the-score

BibTeX
@misc{campagna2026_ventoabbassapunteggio,
  author = {Campagna, Matteo},
  title = {The more wind there is, the lower the score, independently of temperature},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
  url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/wind-lowers-the-score},
  note = {Version 2; accessed 2026-10-16}
}

Other claims in this domain

See all claims on competition and scoring