The set system rewards the more consistent archer
The summary today
The claim is about a specific comparison: for the same arrows, set scoring should favour an archer who shoots steadily over one who mixes excellent arrows with the odd stray one. Testing it would mean comparing, on the same matches, the set verdict with the cumulative-score verdict, and the registry's bibliography holds no study on archers that has done so. The Lab has worked out the exact calculation for modelled archers, not competition data: with the same average score, the steady archer wins 48.5% of matches under cumulative scoring and 45.4% under the set system, which therefore rewards consistency less than cumulative scoring does. Until there are data from real competitions, the status remains "Not studied".
Also phrased as: "the set system rewards consistency"; "set play favours the steadier archer"; "in set matches consistency end by end is what counts"; "set scoring favours the regular archer"
In practice
It is often said that under the set system what counts is steadiness end after end, and that the format was introduced precisely to reward it.
Evidence
No evidence recorded.
Status history
- 2010 Not studied The set system becomes the format for individual recurve matches across the major circuit, and with it the idea that it rewards consistency; the registry's bibliography holds no study on archers that has put this to the test.
Related
Related articles
- Five-all in archery: why it happens, and to whomOne match in five between equals ends five-all, and not by chance: it happens to archers who are alike. How often, where in the bracket and why.
- I scored more and lost: how the set system worksSince 2010 a match has been decided by sets, not by adding up arrows. How it works, how often the lower total wins, and why it happens mostly between equals.
- Types of archery competition: target, indoor, field and 3DTarget, indoor, field and 3D in archery's two worlds, FITARCO and World Archery, FIARC and IFAA: distances, targets, arrows and scoring from the official rulebooks.
Related studies
Where there are no studies on archers, every decision starts from a written hypothesis and is checked against the data over time.
See the work with clubs and federationsCite
Campagna, M. (2026). The set system rewards the more consistent archer (Version 1). In Evidence Registry. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/set-system-rewards-consistency
@misc{campagna2026_setsystemcostanza,
author = {Campagna, Matteo},
title = {The set system rewards the more consistent archer},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/set-system-rewards-consistency},
note = {Version 1; accessed 2026-10-16}
}
Follow this claim
RSS is an address you paste into a feed reader: each time this claim changes status, adds a year to its history or is revised, a new item appears there.
Registry updates by email
At most one email a month, sent only when something has changed: claims that change status, new claims, Lab predictions registered or resolved, new studies and new books.
Sign-ups are handled by Systeme.io, the service that runs the newsletter. Every email has a link to unsubscribe with one click.
Other claims in this domain
- CorroboratedAbout 150 points on a FITA round separate a club archer from a national-team archer13 studies · 492 archers measuredStatus since 2003
- CorroboratedAn archer's arousal rises with what is at stake, and keeps rising as the competition goes on3 studies · 23 archers measuredStatus since 2011
- CorroboratedArchers are more aroused in competition than in training5 studies · 50 archers measuredStatus since 2025
- CorroboratedAt 70 metres a top archer averages about nine points per arrow7 studies · 72 archers measuredStatus since 2012
- CorroboratedEven in competition at the highest level, most arrows are not tens4 studies · 3,212 archers measuredStatus since 2024