Study record
How archery training time is used: Tan 2022 study
Microstructure of practice activities for team and individual sports
Citation
Tan, A. L. S., & Low, J. F. L. (2022; issue 2023). Microstructure of practice activities for team and individual sports. Human Movement, 24(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2023.115919
DOI: 10.5114/hm.2023.115919Read the open-access version
Cite the study
Tan, A. L. S., & Low, J. F. L. (2022; issue 2023). Microstructure of practice activities for team and individual sports. Human Movement, 24(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2023.115919
@article{tan2022practicemicrostructure,
author = {Tan, Angelina Li San and Low, Jeffrey Fook Lee},
title = {Microstructure of practice activities for team and individual sports},
year = {2022},
journal = {Human Movement},
volume = {24},
number = {2},
pages = {70--77},
doi = {10.5114/hm.2023.115919},
note = {Print issue 2023}
}
Technical details
- Design
- Cross-sectional study
- Population
- Mixed
- Level
- National level
- Discipline
- Not stated
- Participants
- 67
- Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Peer review
- Yes
- Published in
- Human Movement
What it measured and what it found
The study filmed training in six sports at a national sports school in Malaysia, archery among them, and measured how the time was divided. Activities were sorted into three types: playing form, meaning open, competition-like practice with opponents, scoring or match conditions; training form, meaning closed technical or physical exercises repeated without variation; and transition, meaning rest, general briefings and time without any sport-specific movement.
The archers spent 83.32% of the time in training form, almost all of it technical work, the highest share of the six sports, and no time at all in playing form; the rest, about 17%, was transition, while physical conditioning took up a minimal share. Hurdlers and volleyball players also did no playing form; squash was the only sport with a substantial share of it (39.54%). Grouping the three individual sports and the three team sports showed no difference for any type of activity: on average 59.06% of the time was training form, 15.33% playing form and 25.61% transition.
How it was measured
For each sport, three sessions run by the same coach were filmed during the pre-competition period with a fixed camera on a tripod, giving 2,294 minutes in all, which were then coded with performance analysis software (LongoMatch). Timing for each activity began when the first athlete started it, and when athletes were doing different things the activity of the majority led by the coach was what counted; collecting arrows was included in the technical activity under way. Three experts reviewed the categories, and agreement between two observers, and for the same observer two weeks apart, was high (intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.90 and 0.99).
There were 10 archers, male and female, with a mean age of 19.5, all competing nationally and some internationally, training 9 times and 18 hours a week in sessions averaging 129 minutes; their coach was 34 with 9 years of experience. Across the six sports there were 67 athletes, from 3 hurdlers to 16 netball players. Time for each activity is expressed as a percentage of the session.
Limitations
For archery the most important point is what was not filmed: the coach explained that on certain days the squad held scoring sessions, small internal competitions, but none of the three filmed sessions was one of them. The zero for playing form therefore depends partly on which days were chosen, and three sessions with a single coach are not enough to describe a whole training programme, as the authors admit. The definition of playing form comes from team sports: in archery, where even in competition each archer shoots alone at a fixed distance, the line between a practice end and a scored one is thin, and the authors discuss this themselves.
Activities were coded for the group rather than for each athlete, and the playing and training figures are slightly inflated because they include collecting equipment and changeovers. The paper does not say whether the archers shot recurve or compound. The registry gives the year as 2022, while the paper appeared in the journal's 2023 volume. Finally, the study does not measure performance, so it cannot say whether one way of dividing the time is better than another.
What it means for archers
For an archer, the study describes something many will recognise: at a school preparing athletes for national competition, almost all the time in the observed sessions went on shooting arrows while working on a technical point, at a fixed distance, without scoring and without any simulation of competition. The authors see this as a traditional approach and think individual sports should also include competition-like practice, but that is their position: the study does not measure whether it would change results, and it acknowledges that neither playing form nor training form has been shown to be superior.
The concrete takeaway for anyone planning their own training is a point of comparison: in sessions lasting more than two hours, the share of time under competition-like conditions was nil, and breaks took up about a sixth of the session.
In the registry
The claims this study is evidence for, with its position and the current status.
- ReportedIn one squad of national-level archers observed in training, almost all the time goes into repeating technique and none into competition-like practice (for)
- ReportedAn elite archer spends more than fifteen hours a week training (for)
- ReportedPhysical conditioning takes up a minimal share of an archer's training session (for)
- ReportedArchery practice spends less time on breaks than other sports (for, context)
Articles that use it
Research line
Population and discipline
Same research line
- 2021Comparison of Upper Extremity Physical Fitness Levels in Wheelchair Archery and Basketball Athletes
- 2022Arch-Support Insoles Benefit the Archery Performance and Stability of Compound Archers
- 2022Comparison of Joint Position Sense in Competitive Recurve Archers and Non-Archers in the Age Group of 15-19 Years Old: A Cross Sectional Study Questionable venue
- 2022Effect of Cognitive Reappraisal on Archery Performance of Elite Athletes: The Mediating Effects of Sport-Confidence and Attention
- 2022From Expert to Elite? Research on Top Archer's EEG Network Topology
- 2022Research on Top Archer's EEG Microstates and Source Analysis in Different States
Cite this record
Campagna, M. (2026). Study record: Microstructure of practice activities for team and individual sports. In Evidence Registry. matteocampagna.com. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/tan-2022-practice-microstructure
@misc{campagna2026_enevidencetan2022practicemicrostructure,
author = {Campagna, Matteo},
title = {Study record: Microstructure of practice activities for team and individual sports},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/tan-2022-practice-microstructure},
note = {accessed 2026-10-16}
}
Registry updates by email
At most one email a month, sent only when something has changed: claims that change status, new claims, Lab predictions registered or resolved, new studies and new books.
Sign-ups are handled by Systeme.io, the service that runs the newsletter. Every email has a link to unsubscribe with one click.