Yoga improves young archers' attention

The summary today

The best evidence comes from a single, well-built study: competitive Indian archers aged 12 to 20 randomly assigned to eight weeks of yoga or to a waiting list, with the assessors blind to the groups, and 82 of them included in the final analysis. On the attention network test, yoga cut the cost of distractors by 36.7 milliseconds more than in the control group and improved orienting, the benefit of knowing in advance where to look, by 18.7, while basic alertness did not change. The gain is selective: on trials with conflicting distractors response times shortened by 44 milliseconds relative to the controls, while on the easy trials the difference was not significant. A second supporting study carries less weight, since it is a two-week before-and-after study of thirteen adult elite archers from the same research group with no control; a third, which did have a control group, appeared in a journal with questionable editorial standards and stays as context. The target is what is missing: nobody has checked whether those milliseconds change the score, and in twenty-five young female archers simple reaction time after eight weeks of yoga stayed where it was, from 0.703 to 0.702 seconds.

Also phrased as: "yoga and focus in archery"; "yoga for archers"; "pranayama and attention"; "yoga in youth archery"; "trataka and concentration"

Evidence

• 2022
  Context Archers Published later

  50 Indian university archers aged 18 to 25, split at random into two groups of 25: twelve weeks of yoga (bhramari, trataka and jala neti) an hour a day six days a week, on top of shooting, against shooting alone. Errors on the mirror-tracing coordination test fall from 30.76 to 18.72 in the yoga group and from 29.84 to 23.64 in the control group (t = 7.192). The journal has questionable editorial standards, the outcome is a laboratory test, and the section on the score, from 69.6 to 102.9 points over eighteen arrows, describes the distances inconsistently (20 or 22 metres for the same target). Under decision D7 it stays as context.

  Impact of Specific Yoga Module with special reference to Bhramari, Trataka and Jala neti on attention among Archers Questionable venue · Nidheesh Yadav, Vipin Rathore

• 2025
  For Archers Published later

  82 state-level competitive Indian archers aged 12 to 20, analysed out of 92 randomised to eight weeks of yoga (three one-hour sessions a week) or to a waiting list, with blinded assessors and a per-protocol analysis, 43 against 39. On the attention network test the conflict index falls from 124.8 to 85.2 ms with yoga and from 110.4 to 107.6 in the control group, a difference of -36.7 ms (95% CI -44.8 to -28.6; p < 0.001; partial eta squared 0.505); orienting rises from 32.9 to 53.2 ms against 37.6 to 39.3, a difference of 18.7 ms (11.7 to 25.7; p < 0.001; 0.261). Accuracy also improves, from 0.964 to 0.977 against 0.964 to 0.965 in the control group (p < 0.001), and so does overall reaction time, -21.6 ms (p = 0.003).

  Effects of Yoga on the Efficiency of the Attentional Networks in Competitive Archers: A Randomized Controlled Trial · Abhijit Baishya, Darshana Hazarika, Kashinath Metri

• 2025
  For Archers Published later

  In the same study the speed gain sits where the task is hard: with conflicting distractors the difference between groups is -43.8 ms (95% CI -59.3 to -28.3; p < 0.001), while in the congruent (-11.0 ms; p = 0.114) and neutral (-13.8 ms; p = 0.073) conditions it is not significant. Among the cues, the largest gain comes when a cue signals in advance where the stimulus will appear, -34.9 ms (p < 0.001), against -16.2 ms with the central cue and -19.0 with no cue.

  Effects of Yoga on the Efficiency of the Attentional Networks in Competitive Archers: A Randomized Controlled Trial · Abhijit Baishya, Darshana Hazarika, Kashinath Metri

• 2025
  Context Archers Published later

  In the same study basic alertness, the alerting network, does not move: a difference between groups of 2.5 ms (95% CI -3.0 to 8.1; p = 0.367). And in the control group, with no yoga, the mean time still falls from 630.9 to 614.1 ms (p < 0.001) simply from repeating the test, while the three networks stay put.

  Effects of Yoga on the Efficiency of the Attentional Networks in Competitive Archers: A Randomized Controlled Trial · Abhijit Baishya, Darshana Hazarika, Kashinath Metri

• 2025
  Context Archers Published later

  At baseline, in these adolescent archers the cost of conflicting distractors is far larger than the benefit of spatial cues: the conflict index is 124.8 and 110.4 ms in the two groups, orienting 32.9 and 37.6. Yoga acts precisely where the starting cost is highest.

  Effects of Yoga on the Efficiency of the Attentional Networks in Competitive Archers: A Randomized Controlled Trial · Abhijit Baishya, Darshana Hazarika, Kashinath Metri

• 2025
  For Archers Published later

  14 adult elite Indian archers, 13 of whom complete six supervised yoga sessions over two weeks, before and after with no control group, in the study that builds the programme later used in the randomised trial. On the Stroop test times fall from 971 to 872 ms in the congruent condition, from 1,163 to 1,019 in the incongruent one and from 1,056 to 917 in the neutral one (10 to 13 per cent, p between 0.0015 and 0.0035); accuracy rises, for instance from 89.6 to 95.8 per cent on incongruent trials, and total errors fall from 11.8 to 3.2 (p = 0.005). These are adults, not young archers, and without a control the effect of repeating the test cannot be separated from that of yoga.

  Yoga for Archers: Development, Validation, and Feasibility Testing of a Yoga Module · Abhijit Baishya, Darshana Hazarika, Kashinath Metri

• 2026
  Context Archers Published later

  25 Indian female archers aged 15 to 17, eight weeks of yoga, before and after with no control, in a journal with questionable editorial standards: visual-manual reaction time is 0.703 seconds before and 0.702 after, with a standard deviation of 0.07 both times. The article's abstract reports a significant improvement that the table does not show.

  Effects of yoga training on anthropometric and selected health-related fitness components in female archery players Questionable venue · Kamalpreet Kaur, Parmveer Singh

Status history

1. 2022 Not studied The first piece of data arrives, and it is weak. Fifty Indian university archers are split at random into two groups: those who add twelve weeks of yoga to their shooting, an hour a day six days a week, make fewer errors on a mirror-tracing coordination test, from 30.8 to 18.7, against a drop from 29.8 to 23.6 in those who only shoot. There is a control group, but the outcome is a laboratory test rather than attention while shooting, and the journal has questionable editorial standards: a result from a questionable venue cannot settle the status on its own, and the question remains unstudied.
2. 2025 Reported The same Indian group publishes two studies. The first is the best this question has: ninety-two competitive archers aged 12 to 20 randomised to eight weeks of yoga or to a waiting list, with blinded assessors, and 82 analysed at the end. Yoga cuts the cost of distractors by 36.7 milliseconds more than in the control group and improves orienting by 18.7, but it leaves basic alertness untouched, and on the easy trials the difference is not significant; meanwhile in the control group times shorten anyway simply from repeating the test, which shows how much the comparison group matters. The second is a before-and-after study with no control in thirteen adult elite archers: after six sessions over two weeks Stroop response times fall by 10 to 13 per cent and errors from 11.8 to 3.2. With the randomised trial comes the first supporting study in a venue without reservations, and with the before-and-after study a second, weaker one; neither looks at the score: reported.
3. 2026 Reported In twenty-five Indian female archers aged 15 to 17, after eight weeks of yoga, visual-manual reaction time goes from 0.703 to 0.702 seconds, even though the article's abstract reports a significant improvement. It is a before-and-after study with no control, in a journal with questionable editorial standards, and it measures simple speed rather than the handling of distractors: it does not call the randomised trial into question, but it is a reminder that not every measure of attention responds. The status stays at reported.

Related

Related articles

• Concentration in archery: how it is measured, how much it matters and whether it can be trainedWhat studies on archers say about concentration: how it is measured, whether it tracks score, whether it fades late in a round and whether it can be trained.
• Meditation, mindfulness and yoga in archers: what moves and what does notWhat meditation, mindfulness and yoga change in archers: the studies find more effect on attention and on how archers feel than on the score.

Research lines

• 52 studiesMental training: what has been tested on archers since 1979
• 55 studiesAttention and cognition in archers: research since 1986

Other claims in this domain

• ReportedA larger working memory does not make an archer more accurate3 studies · 79 archers measuredStatus since 2012
• ReportedA longer quiet eye improves shooting accuracy3 studies · 58 archers measuredStatus since 2017
• ReportedA mental profile tells archers apart from athletes in other sports only in part5 studies · 550 archers measuredStatus since 2018
• ReportedA mental training programme improves the elite archer's mood1 study · 16 archers measuredStatus since 2023
• ReportedA mental training programme reduces burnout in elite archers1 study · 16 archers measuredStatus since 2023

See all claims on mind and attention