Beta-blockers improve accuracy in archery

3 studies · 17 archers measured

ForContextAgainst199019952000200520102015202020252019, context, n = 131990, context, n = 42021, against
Each circle is a study: its position gives the year, its row whether it is for, against or context, its size how many participants it measured. Light circles are studies on other populations or without archers.

The idea comes from pistol shooting, where two studies had found a benefit; in archery the ban dates from 1985. The only controlled study of archers in the bibliography, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled in 15 national-team archers, saw heart rate fall with two different beta-blockers but no improvement in score, body sway or aiming stability. The status rests on this one study because it is the design that tests the claim directly, randomised and placebo-controlled, and no study of archers in the bibliography points the other way; it is still a single study, though, with a single dose and a simulated indoor match at 18 metres.

Also phrased as: "beta-blockers in archery"; "do beta-blockers stop tremor"; "propranolol and aiming"; "why beta-blockers are banned in archery"

In practice

It is often said that beta-blockers are banned in archery because they slow the heart and stop tremor, and so improve aiming.

Evidence

  • 1990
    Context Archers Published later

    4 elite archers, 240 arrows: the best arrows were associated with a lengthening of the cardiac cycle before the loose and with the first finger movement of the loose falling in the ST or mid-cycle phase of the ECG. It is an association, not a drug test.

    Fine Body Movements and the Cardiac Cycle in Archery · David Keast, Bruce Elliott

  • 2019
    Context Archers Published later

    13 international-level archers: with heart rate raised to about 166 to 168 beats per minute by shuttle runs, scores at 18 metres did not change compared with shooting at rest.

    Effect of heart rate on shooting performance in elite archers · Caner Açıkada, Tahir Hazır, Alper Asçı, Sinem Hazır Aytar, Cevdet Tınazcı

  • 2021
    Against Archers Published later

    15 male archers from the Turkish national squads, 20.5 years old on average, a randomised double-blind crossover with four trials of 30 arrows at 18 m (bisoprolol 5 mg, propranolol 40 mg, placebo and nothing): shooting heart rate falls by 12.8% with the selective drug and 8.6% with the non-selective one, a very large effect on the heart, while the score does not improve. The only effect that showed up on the points was a drop with propranolol, which did not survive the Bonferroni correction. Aim-point fluctuation in the three tenths of a second before release also stays as it is on placebo (7.86 ± 2.50 cm with bisoprolol, 9.05 ± 2.31 with propranolol, 8.29 ± 1.91 with nothing, 8.41 ± 2.02 with placebo), as does centre-of-pressure displacement (10.29 ± 4.17 and 10.26 ± 3.72 against 11.03 ± 4.00 and 11.86 ± 3.74, not a significant difference). The same experiment also measures three things that help in reading the result: the two drugs are not equivalent to each other, since the selective one lowers the heart rate more than the non-selective one and leaves the aim a little steadier, yet neither does better than placebo; knowing you have taken a tablet changes nothing, with placebo and no drug at 75.1 ± 8.4 and 74.8 ± 6.1 beats lying down and 94.1 ± 13.4 and 94.0 ± 7.2 standing; and simply standing up, before the bow is even in hand, raises the rate by 20.2 beats on average, a rise that falls to 13.3 with the drug.

    Effects of beta-blockers on archery performance, body sway and aiming behaviour · Emin Ergen, Tahir Hazir, Mesut Celebi, Ayşe Kin-Isler, Serdar Aritan, Volkan Daghan Yaylıoglu, et al.

Status history

  1. 1990 Not studied The archer's heart rate and the moment the loose starts had been studied for some time, and that is where the idea of shooting better with a slower heart comes from. In the registry's bibliography, though, nobody had tried doing it with a drug: the claim was circulating with no direct test at all.
  2. 2019 Not studied A result on archers weakens the premise without testing the drug: with heart rate raised to around 166 to 168 beats by shuttle runs, the scores at 18 metres of thirteen international-level archers do not change compared with shooting at rest. If a much higher heart rate does not worsen the score, it is less obvious that lowering it would improve it; but a direct test with a beta-blocker is still missing.
  3. 2021 Contradicted The first randomised study of archers in the bibliography finds no improvement in score, postural sway or aiming with either a selective or a non-selective beta-blocker.

Related

Related articles

Research lines

Cite
APA

Campagna, M. (2026). Beta-blockers improve accuracy in archery (Version 2). In Evidence Registry. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/health/beta-blockers-accuracy

BibTeX
@misc{campagna2026_betabloccantiprecisione,
  author = {Campagna, Matteo},
  title = {Beta-blockers improve accuracy in archery},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
  url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/health/beta-blockers-accuracy},
  note = {Version 2; accessed 2026-10-16}
}

Other claims in this domain

See all claims on health and recovery