A wrist accelerometer can pick out the moment of the shot, and does it better when the signal is processed
1 study · 6 archers measured
The summary today
A single 2025 study says so, released as a preprint and not yet through a journal. Six adolescent professional archers, four girls and two boys aged 14 to 16, shot in an official competition wearing a wristband developed by the authors on the bow-hand wrist, recording acceleration at 20 hertz, and a neural network had to separate the stretches of signal that contain a shot, from the start of the draw to the release, from those at rest: it does not tell the draw, the aim and the release apart, it picks out the shot from everything else. Given only the three raw axes, its accuracy is 84.5%; adding two quantities calculated from the signal, total acceleration and its smoothed derivative, takes it to 96.0%. The sensor is the same in both cases, so the eleven and a half points of difference come from the processing, and that is the part of the claim the data supports best. The limit lies in the numbers: six archers, a 70:30 split of the data that does not show how the model behaves with an archer it has never seen, and a second measure, which the authors designed for real use, that only rises from 67.9% to 75%.
Also phrased as: "smartwatch for archery"; "wrist sensor for archery"; "accelerometer shot detection"; "wristband that recognises the shot"
In practice
You hear that a smartwatch or a wristband is enough to count the shots and know how long each one lasts, as if the sensor could read the shot on its own.
Evidence
-
2025
For Archers Published later
6 Chinese adolescent professional archers, 4 girls and 2 boys aged 14.9 to 16.3, in official competition, with a 20 Hz accelerometer wristband on the bow-hand wrist; 4-second windows classed as shot, from draw to release, or rest. LSTM network with the X, Y and Z axes alone: 84.53% accuracy, F1 83.45. Adding total acceleration and the smoothed derivative: 95.99% and F1 95.95. The gain comes from processing the signal.
A Machine Learning-Based Multimodal Framework for Wearable Sensor-Based Archery Action Recognition and Stress Estimation · Xianghe Liu, Jiajia Liu, Chuxian Xu, Minghan Wang, Hongbo Peng, Tao Sun, Jiaqi Xu
-
2025
Context Archers Published later
In the same study, the limits: sample-level accuracy, the measure the authors put forward for real use, only rises from 67.86% to 75.00%; a bidirectional network reaches 96.80% but costs more computing; the data are split 70:30 between training and testing, with no check on archers left out of training. The wristband was developed by the authors themselves, and the paper is a preprint.
A Machine Learning-Based Multimodal Framework for Wearable Sensor-Based Archery Action Recognition and Stress Estimation · Xianghe Liu, Jiajia Liu, Chuxian Xu, Minghan Wang, Hongbo Peng, Tao Sun, Jiaqi Xu
Status history
- 2025 Reported The first and only study arrives: six adolescent professional archers in official competition with a 20-hertz wristband on the bow-hand wrist, and a neural network that has to separate the stretches of signal containing a shot from those at rest. With the raw axes alone it manages 84.5%, and adding total acceleration and the smoothed derivative takes it to 96.0%: eleven and a half points that come from the processing, since the sensor is the same. Six subjects, a preprint and a methodological validation with no test on new archers: reported.
Related
Related articles
- The future of archery: technology, research, evolutionWhat has already been measured about technology in archery: virtual reality, sensors, video, the quiet eye, camera scoring and shooting machines.
- Video analysis and self-coaching in archery: the practical guideHow to film your own shot and what to look for, what the camera measures badly, when sensors help, and what research says about video, feel and the training journal.
Research lines
Cite
Campagna, M. (2026). A wrist accelerometer can pick out the moment of the shot, and does it better when the signal is processed (Version 1). In Evidence Registry. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/equipment/wrist-accelerometer-detects-the-shot
@misc{campagna2026_accelerometropolsofasitiro,
author = {Campagna, Matteo},
title = {A wrist accelerometer can pick out the moment of the shot, and does it better when the signal is processed},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/equipment/wrist-accelerometer-detects-the-shot},
note = {Version 1; accessed 2026-10-16}
}
Follow this claim
RSS is an address you paste into a feed reader: each time this claim changes status, adds a year to its history or is revised, a new item appears there.
Registry updates by email
At most one email a month, sent only when something has changed: claims that change status, new claims, Lab predictions registered or resolved, new studies and new books.
Sign-ups are handled by Systeme.io, the service that runs the newsletter. Every email has a link to unsubscribe with one click.
Other claims in this domain
- CorroboratedAlong its flight the arrow loses an appreciable part of its launch speed12 studiesStatus since 2011
- CorroboratedAs it leaves the bow, the arrow flexes and snakes around the riser instead of leaving straight19 studies · 47 archers measuredStatus since 2012
- ReportedA camera-based scoring system misreads some arrows: the ones barely sticking out and the ones that shift the target face7 studies · 2 archers measuredStatus since 2017
- ReportedA chest band with fibre optic sensors measures breathing and mean heart rate with small errors, and an archer can wear it while shooting2 studiesStatus since 2019
- ReportedA compound bow stores between 70 and 100 joules and sheds about two thirds of the force at full draw4 studiesStatus since 2015