Study record

A hat instead of the kisser? Yanda 2025 study

Needs Assessment for the Development of Archerymad Hat as an Alternative to Replace the Kisser Button in Archery

Zaskya Riski Yanda, Razali Razali, Muhammad Iqbal, Amiruddin Amiruddin, Iskandar Iskandar, Zahara Zahara2025

Citation

Yanda, Z. R., Razali, R., Iqbal, M., Amiruddin, A., Iskandar, I., & Zahara, Z. (2025). Needs Assessment for the Development of Archerymad Hat as an Alternative to Replace the Kisser Button in Archery. Path of Science, 11(5), 4010-4014. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.117-35

Cite the study
APA

Yanda, Z. R., Razali, R., Iqbal, M., Amiruddin, A., Iskandar, I., & Zahara, Z. (2025). Needs Assessment for the Development of Archerymad Hat as an Alternative to Replace the Kisser Button in Archery. Path of Science, 11(5), 4010-4014. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.117-35

BibTeX
@article{yanda2025hatkisser,
  author = {Yanda, Zaskya Riski and Razali, Razali and Iqbal, Muhammad and Amiruddin, Amiruddin and Iskandar, Iskandar and Zahara, Zahara},
  title = {Needs Assessment for the Development of Archerymad Hat as an Alternative to Replace the Kisser Button in Archery},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Path of Science},
  volume = {11},
  number = {5},
  pages = {4010--4014},
  doi = {10.22178/pos.117-35}
}

Technical details

Design
Cross-sectional study
Population
Mixed
Level
Mixed levels
Discipline
Not stated
Participants
15
Type
Journal article
Language
English
Peer review
Yes
Published in
Path of Science

What it measured and what it found

The study does not test a product: it is a preliminary survey of the need for a hat, the "Archery MAD Hat", which the authors conceived as an alternative to the kisser button, giving a consistent reference for the head. Fifteen people, a mix of experts, provincial board members, coaches and Indonesian archers, answered ten yes/no questions. All 15 say they often wear a hat when shooting and that it shields them from glare; 12 say it makes them feel more confident, and 9 that it helps their shooting and affects technique and posture. Eleven had used a kisser button and 11 do not find it bothersome; the 4 who do mention trouble getting used to it, minor injuries and a bad smell after long use. Nobody considers it compulsory. Only 6 of the 15 think a hat helps beginners stay consistent, but 12 of 15 support developing an alternative to the kisser button.

How it was measured

The closed-ended questionnaire was sent out through Google Forms as the first step of a ten-stage product development model (Borg and Gall's). The authors also present an evaluation grid on a five-point Likert scale, with criteria such as originality, safety, usefulness and advantages over the kisser button, but that grid belongs to later stages: in this paper the results are only counts of yes and no answers. How many respondents fell into each category, what bow they used and at what level they shot is not stated, and the table of questions is given in Indonesian.

Limitations

The hat itself is not described: the paper does not say how it would act as an anchor reference, where it touches the face or the string, and it does not show it. The paper reports no trial of the hat and no shooting measurement, so the statements about better consistency and performance are the authors' expectations. Fifteen yes/no answers from a group chosen without stated criteria, and without distinguishing recurve, compound or traditional bows, describe opinions; some of them even point away from the conclusion, since most respondents do not find the kisser button bothersome and do not think a hat helps beginners.

What it means for archers

For archers the study changes nothing: there is no tested product and no comparison with the kisser button. It only says that in the small group surveyed a hat is a common habit, mainly against the sun, and that the kisser button is seen as an optional aid that bothers some people. Whether an alternative head reference works better than a kisser button is still entirely to be measured, with the hat on and arrows in the target.

In the registry

The claims this study is evidence for, with its position and the current status.

Articles that use it

Cite this record
APA

Campagna, M. (2026). Study record: Needs Assessment for the Development of Archerymad Hat as an Alternative to Replace the Kisser Button in Archery. In Evidence Registry. matteocampagna.com. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/yanda-2025-hat-kisser

BibTeX
@misc{campagna2026_enevidenceyanda2025hatkisser,
  author = {Campagna, Matteo},
  title = {Study record: Needs Assessment for the Development of Archerymad Hat as an Alternative to Replace the Kisser Button in Archery},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
  url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/yanda-2025-hat-kisser},
  note = {accessed 2026-10-16}
}