Study record
Relaxation and focus in archers: Verawati 2020
The Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Concentration in Archery Atheletes at the UNIMED Club
Citation
Verawati, I., Suprayetno, & Valianto, B. (2020). The Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Concentration in Archery Atheletes at the UNIMED Club. Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Sport Science (UnICoSS 2019), 23, 70-73. https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.200305.022
DOI: 10.2991/ahsr.k.200305.022
Cite the study
Verawati, I., Suprayetno, & Valianto, B. (2020). The Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Concentration in Archery Atheletes at the UNIMED Club. Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Sport Science (UnICoSS 2019), 23, 70-73. https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.200305.022
@inproceedings{verawati2020progressiverelaxation,
author = {Verawati, Indah and Suprayetno and Valianto, Budi},
title = {The Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Concentration in Archery Atheletes at the UNIMED Club},
year = {2020},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Sport Science (UnICoSS 2019)},
volume = {23},
pages = {70--73},
doi = {10.2991/ahsr.k.200305.022}
}
Technical details
- Design
- Controlled trial
- Population
- Archers
- Level
- Club level
- Discipline
- Not stated
- Participants
- 12
- Type
- Conference paper
- Language
- English
- Peer review
- Not stated
- Published in
- Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Sport Science (UnICoSS 2019)
What it measured and what it found
Twelve archers from the club of the State University of Medan (UNIMED), Indonesia, were split into two groups of six, matched on concentration level. One group did about 10 minutes of progressive muscle relaxation at the end of each training session, the other did nothing. Concentration was measured before and after with the concentration grid, a sheet showing the numbers 00 to 99 in random order, to be found in sequence for two minutes.
In the relaxation group the mean score rose from 16 to 21.67, an average gain of 5.5; in the control group from 16 to 16.33, a gain of 0.67. At the start the groups did not differ (p 0.414). The improvement within the relaxation group is significant (p 0.027), the control group's is not (p 0.157), and after the programme the two groups differ (p 0.027). The authors work out an advantage of 4.83 points for the relaxation group and conclude that progressive muscle relaxation increases archers' concentration.
How it was measured
The design has an experimental and a control group, measured before and after. Archers already in the top band of the grid were excluded, to leave room for improvement. The score is the highest number reached in two minutes minus errors. The grid's validity was judged by a single sport psychologist; reliability is given as a correlation of 0.978, without saying between which measurements. The analysis uses the Wilcoxon test.
The relaxation took place after physical and technical training, ahead of a selection event. The description also includes seeking a state of calm alertness and suggestions about concentration, so something more than muscle relaxation alone. The number of sessions, the overall length of the programme and the archers' age, sex, experience and bow type are not reported.
Limitations
Six archers per group is very few, and without knowing how many sessions there were it is impossible to tell what dose produced the result. The control group did nothing in place of relaxation, so the attention received also plays a part, and the paper does not say whether the person measuring knew the groups. The two groups are compared with each other using the Wilcoxon test, which is meant for paired measurements on the same people, not for separate groups.
There are inconsistencies too: the club population is given as 10 athletes, yet the sample is 12; the control group's starting mean, recalculated from the table, is 15.67, not 16. Above all, the grid measures visual search for numbers on a sheet of paper, not concentration on the shot, and the study records no competition or training scores.
What it means for archers
The study shows that six archers who did ten minutes of relaxation after training improved on a paper number-search task, and six who did not, did not. It says nothing about shooting: nobody measured scores, groups or shot timing. For anyone already using relaxation it is no reason to stop, since no negative effect emerges; for anyone who does not, it is no evidence that relaxation helps them shoot better.
In the registry
The claims this study is evidence for, with its position and the current status.
Articles that use it
Research line
Same research line
- 2019Effects of a Single-Dose of Mind-Body Practice on the Heart Rate Variability, Brain Activity and Shooting Performance in Archers: A Pilot Study Questionable venue
- 2020A Case Study on the Effect of Imagery Training for Elite Archers of South Korea
- 2020Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Skill Development Program on Elite Archers’ Mental Skills and Mindfulness Levels
- 2020Neurotracker Training to Improve The Archery Athlete Concentration
- 2020Perbandingan Metode Latihan Visualisasi dan Relaksasi terhadap Peningkatan Skor Jarak 10 Meter pada Atlet Panahan Tingkat Pemula
- 2021Efficiency and Enhancement in Attention Networks of Elite Shooting and Archery Athletes
Cite this record
Campagna, M. (2026). Study record: The Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Concentration in Archery Atheletes at the UNIMED Club. In Evidence Registry. matteocampagna.com. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/verawati-2020-progressive-relaxation
@misc{campagna2026_enevidenceverawati2020progressiverelaxat,
author = {Campagna, Matteo},
title = {Study record: The Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Concentration in Archery Atheletes at the UNIMED Club},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/verawati-2020-progressive-relaxation},
note = {accessed 2026-10-16}
}
Registry updates by email
At most one email a month, sent only when something has changed: claims that change status, new claims, Lab predictions registered or resolved, new studies and new books.
Sign-ups are handled by Systeme.io, the service that runs the newsletter. Every email has a link to unsubscribe with one click.