Study record

Shoulder band work and 15 m archery: Rukmana 2025

Resistance Band Shoulder Training and 15 Meter Archery Gains

Khumairo Hardiyanti Rukmana, Widi Arti2025

Citation

Rukmana, K. H., & Arti, W. (2025). Resistance Band Shoulder Training and 15 Meter Archery Gains. Academia Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.7446

Cite the study
APA

Rukmana, K. H., & Arti, W. (2025). Resistance Band Shoulder Training and 15 Meter Archery Gains. Academia Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.7446

BibTeX
@article{rukmana2025resistancebandshoulder,
  author = {Rukmana, Khumairo Hardiyanti and Arti, Widi},
  title = {Resistance Band Shoulder Training and 15 Meter Archery Gains},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Academia Open},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  doi = {10.21070/acopen.10.2025.7446}
}

Technical details

Design
Case study
Population
Archers
Level
Club level
Discipline
Not stated
Participants
1
Type
Journal article
Language
English
Peer review
Yes
Published in
Academia Open (regional journal)

What it measured and what it found

A single archer, a student who had been in an Indonesian university club for a year, followed a six-week programme of shoulder exercises with an elastic band, twice a week, for a total of twelve sessions. Before starting she said that in training her arrows often missed the target from the third end onwards and that she struggled to hold her arm in position during the draw.

After the programme her grip strength measured with a dynamometer went from 20 to 21.5 kg in the dominant hand and from 17 to 18 kg in the other; a shoulder mobility test, in which the arms are lifted as high as possible while lying face down, rose from 20 to 22.3 cm. Over 36 arrows at 15 metres her score went from 116 to 124 points. The tables also show something else: 18 of the 36 arrows missed the target before and 16 of 36 afterwards, and in both tests the score tended to fall end after end. After the programme the first end was worth 40 points instead of 31, but the last only 5 instead of 17.

How it was measured

The study was carried out between February and April 2023 by a physiotherapy degree programme. The participant was chosen because she was female, aged 19 to 22, an active club member for at least a year, with a normal body mass index and no shoulder or arm problems. The band was a 0.6 mm Thera-Band, described as equivalent to 15 pounds (6.8 kg). The programme progressed in stages: in the first two weeks shoulder flexion and abduction, scapular retraction, and internal and external rotation; then rotation with the arm at 90 degrees and diagonal movements; in the last two weeks also overhead horizontal abduction and wall slides. Each exercise was 10 repetitions with a 10 second hold and 8 seconds' rest, in one or two sets, for sessions of 18 to 50 minutes.

Strength was measured as grip strength, with the elbow bent at 90 degrees and two attempts per hand; mobility with the shoulder elevation test, measuring the distance from the floor to the base of the thumb; and accuracy with a round of 6 ends of 6 arrows at 15 metres, before and after. The paper does not give the type of bow, the draw weight, the target face, or whether the participant kept up her shooting training over the same period.

Limitations

With a single person and a single shooting test before and after, a difference of 8 points over 36 arrows, with half the arrows off the target, lies within ordinary day-to-day variation and cannot be credited to the exercises. The decline from end to end is in fact steeper after the programme, something the paper does not discuss. There is no comparison with anyone who did not follow the programme, and it is not known what changed in her training or equipment in the meantime.

The measures are weak for what they are meant to show: grip strength concerns the hand and forearm, not the shoulder muscles trained with the band, and a gain of one to one and a half kilograms is small enough to fall within the variation between one attempt and the next. The normal and weak categories come from generic reference values. The paper itself acknowledges that the exercises did not reproduce the shooting movement and that the doses and timing of the programme were not ideal. The journal is a regional publication, and the paper prints personal details of the participant in its tables.

What it means for archers

For archers the study adds nothing to build on: it reports that a novice archer did six weeks of band exercises and then shot a few more points, with almost as many misses (16 instead of 18) and an even sharper drop in the last ends. The problem she described, struggling to hold the draw as the arrows go by, is real and common in beginners; this work, though, does not say whether band training solves it.

In the registry it counts as a case report, useful mainly to show how little can be drawn from one person and a single test before and after. Shoulder pain or restricted movement, for that matter, are matters for an in-person assessment by a physiotherapist, which a programme read in a paper does not replace.

In the registry

The claims this study is evidence for, with its position and the current status.

Research line

Same research line

Cite this record
APA

Campagna, M. (2026). Study record: Resistance Band Shoulder Training and 15 Meter Archery Gains. In Evidence Registry. matteocampagna.com. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/rukmana-2025-resistance-band-shoulder

BibTeX
@misc{campagna2026_enevidencerukmana2025resistancebandshoul,
  author = {Campagna, Matteo},
  title = {Study record: Resistance Band Shoulder Training and 15 Meter Archery Gains},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
  url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/rukmana-2025-resistance-band-shoulder},
  note = {accessed 2026-10-16}
}