Study record
Muscle activity in para archery: Gianikellis 2000
Development of a Measurement Chain to Evaluate Muscular Intervention in Archery Performed by Physically Disabled
Citation
Gianikellis, K., Pantrigo, J. J., & Galapero, L. (2000). Development of a Measurement Chain to Evaluate Muscular Intervention in Archery Performed by Physically Disabled. ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/2257
https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/2257Read the open-access version
Cite the study
Gianikellis, K., Pantrigo, J. J., & Galapero, L. (2000). Development of a Measurement Chain to Evaluate Muscular Intervention in Archery Performed by Physically Disabled. ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/2257
@inproceedings{gianikellis2000chainevaluate,
author = {Gianikellis, Kostas and Pantrigo, Juan José and Galapero, Laura},
title = {Development of a Measurement Chain to Evaluate Muscular Intervention in Archery Performed by Physically Disabled},
year = {2000},
booktitle = {ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive},
url = {https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/2257}
}
Technical details
- Design
- Methodological
- Population
- Archers
- Level
- Not stated
- Discipline
- Not stated
- Type
- Conference paper
- Language
- English
- Peer review
- Not stated
- Published in
- ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive
What it measured and what it found
This conference contribution, presented at the 2000 ISBS symposium, reports no measurements on archers: it describes a measuring system built at the University of Extremadura to study the shooting of archers with physical disabilities. The system records surface electromyography of the main muscles, joint posture from electrogoniometers and the flexing of the bow during the draw, read by a sensor of the same kind mounted on the bow, all at the same time.
The authors show examples of raw signals, their spectra and a curve of bow deformation during the draw, and list the parameters the system can calculate. They argue that, besides the study of technique, the system could give the archer real-time feedback on how they load the bow. They do not say how many athletes it was tried on, or what their disabilities were.
How it was measured
The measuring chain combines an electromyography system with a Biometrics electrogoniometer system. The electrodes are active silver/silver chloride surface electrodes, 0.5 cm in diameter; the signal passes through a differential amplifier with gain from 10 to 10,000, filtering that removes content below 10 or 100 Hz and above 300, 1,000 or 2,000 Hz, a 50 Hz notch filter for mains noise, then into a 12-bit acquisition card with a combined sampling rate of 50 kHz across 16 channels, eight for electromyography and four for the goniometers. The goniometers and torsiometers are light, flexible strain-gauge sensors with a stated accuracy of 1.5 degrees over 90 degrees from neutral and a precision better than one degree.
Processing is done in MATLAB. From the rectified electromyographic signal the system derives the mean rectified value, the root mean square, a moving average and the integral, which can be normalised to maximal contraction or to the bow's draw weight; from the power spectrum it derives the median frequency, the mean frequency and the bandwidth. From the bow's deformation it calculates indices of the draw such as the force gradient.
The method explained: Surface EMG in archery: what it measures and how to read it
Limitations
This is a technical description, with no stated participants, no data and no test of the system's reliability or validity. In particular, it is not shown that the flexing read by the goniometer on the bow corresponds to the force applied to the string. The claim that, at full draw, the gap between draw weight and muscle tension could cause injury over time is presented as obvious but is not backed by measurements. The work is more than twenty years old and the equipment is that of its time.
What it means for archers
For an archer today nothing changes, because there are no findings to apply. The contribution is of historical interest to anyone who follows para archery: it shows that as early as 2000 researchers were planning to study the technique of archers with disabilities by measuring muscles, joints and bow load together, and to use the draw curve as immediate feedback. In the registry it counts as the description of a method, not as evidence on how archers with disabilities shoot.
Research line
Population and discipline
Same research line
- 1994Fatigue effects on shooting archery performance
- 1994Multifactorial analysis of shooting archery
- 1998Coordinative Aspects of Archery - An Approach Using Surface-Electromyography
- 2003Activation patterns in forearm muscles during archery shooting
- 2005Quantification the relationship between FITA scores and EMG skill indexes in archery
- 2006Archery performance level and repeatability of event-related EMG
Cite this record
Campagna, M. (2026). Study record: Development of a Measurement Chain to Evaluate Muscular Intervention in Archery Performed by Physically Disabled. In Evidence Registry. matteocampagna.com. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/gianikellis-2000-chain-evaluate
@misc{campagna2026_enevidencegianikellis2000chainevaluate,
author = {Campagna, Matteo},
title = {Study record: Development of a Measurement Chain to Evaluate Muscular Intervention in Archery Performed by Physically Disabled},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/evidence/gianikellis-2000-chain-evaluate},
note = {accessed 2026-10-16}
}
Registry updates by email
At most one email a month, sent only when something has changed: claims that change status, new claims, Lab predictions registered or resolved, new studies and new books.
Sign-ups are handled by Systeme.io, the service that runs the newsletter. Every email has a link to unsubscribe with one click.