https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/declared-level-and-score Changes to this claim in Matteo Campagna's evidence registry: its status, its year-by-year history, revisions of the page. en-gb https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/declared-level-and-scoreWhen level is assigned from outside, through national-team selection or membership of a squad, and the score is measured afterwards, the direction is always the same. Ten Turkish national-team archers scored 1296-1322 FITA points against 1147-1157 for club beginners; ten Olympic-level archers from the British squad outscored ten archers from a university club at 30 m (F = 12.38, p = 0.003); sixteen from the Chinese national squad scored 8.7 points per arrow at 70 m against 6.8 for the Beijing squad. The gap holds on average, though, not for the individual: in the Beijing squad someone reached 8.2, above the weakest member of the national squad (7.7); between high school and university in Taiwan the step is 74 points in recurve and 7 in compound, where scores are already close to the maximum; in Malaysia the distributions at the state games and the university championships overlap. Many studies, moreover, form their groups on the score itself, and there the comparison is circular. A level label follows the score on average, in Olympic recurve more than in compound, and says little about the individual archer.claim:livello-dichiarato-punteggio:revision:2026-09-28:3Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:00:00 GMT https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/declared-level-and-scoreclaim:livello-dichiarato-punteggio:new_claim:2026-09-23:riportatoWed, 23 Sep 2026 08:00:00 GMT