https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/non-verbal-communication-in-competition Changes to this claim in Matteo Campagna's evidence registry: its status, its year-by-year history, revisions of the page. en-gb https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/non-verbal-communication-in-competitionThere are two readings by the same author of the Tokyo 2020 Games, both of videos of the Korean women's team and both in regional journals, and they do not say the same thing. In the individual final the signs coded between archer and coach number ten: two purely verbal, four purely gestural and four mixed, and on the shooting line there is no exchange made of words alone; the high five appears both on and off the line. In the team final, read with the same method, there are nineteen signs and the proportions even out: seven gestural only, six verbal only, six mixed, even though the author concludes that gesture prevails here too. What shows there is a division of tasks rather than a predominance: every instruction goes through the voice, the high five and encouragement through gesture, in a regular alternation of instruction before the shot and high five after it. Counted the same way, more than half of the signs contain words in both finals, six out of ten and twelve out of nineteen: gesture dominates encouragement, but there is no overall predominance of wordless exchanges, and that is why the status is "Not studied". And the method matters: it is a semiotic reading of one video by one person, with no second observer and no count of all the exchanges, on a single team.claim:comunicazione-non-verbale-gara:revision:2026-05-09:2Sat, 09 May 2026 08:00:00 GMT https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/competition/non-verbal-communication-in-competitionclaim:comunicazione-non-verbale-gara:new_claim:2026-03-20:non_studiatoFri, 20 Mar 2026 08:00:00 GMT